"Social organization" tends to be all-encompassing and a rather vague concept. Social organizations among primates vary primarily on the basis of the following factors:
1. Group Size
2. Group Composition
3. Mating Systems
4. Social Roles - especially for adult females and males
5. Various Types of Dominance
6. Permanence versus Instability of Group Membership
7. Tendency to Aggregate into Larger Social Groups
8. Presence of only Heterosexual Reproductive Units, All-Male
Groups or All-Female Groups, or Single Individuals
9. Patterns of Interactions.
The best way to examine primate societies may be to divide them into groups
based on: (A) large troops, medium-size groups, and small units, or (B)
multi-female and multi-male; uni-male and multi-female; uni-male and uni-female,
or (C) multiple mating by males and females, polygynous, and monogamous.
Several trends can be noted if we look at these possible ways to group primate
societies. First, monogamous groups are small, normally containing only
one fully adult female and one fully adult male and their offspring. Gibbons
fit this model well. Second, a system of multiple matings by both females
and males or multi-females are usually the largest of primate societies.
Some groups can reach 300 individuals in these cases. Third, polygynous
groups contain one adult male and several adult females and off-spring and
are moderate in size. Gorilla troops fit this profile. Keep in mind that
polygynous groups such as this, also called harems, maximize reproduction
by keeping a pool of receptive females available. It is also true that the
greatest sexual dimorphism - difference in size between males and females
- occur in polygynous societies.
Primates that live in monogamous societies exhibit the following features:
a lack of sexual dimorphism in size and coloration; a lack of specialized
defense roles against predators by adult males; highly developed territoriality
in both sexes; extensive care of young by the adult male; and closely fashioned
activities by adult female and male.
Primates that live in polygymous groups typically show the following characteristics:
closely bonded
adult females,
somewhat peripheral or socially aloof reproductive male; strong intolerance
by the reproductive males of other, potentially reproductive males; leadership
shown by at least some females in many aspects of group life, while the
adult male shows an outward-from-the-group orientation; some turnover in
reproductive males.
primates and is based on an individual female and
her offspring. Adult males and females do not form permanent mixed-sex groups
nor do males and females tend to travel with each other. Individual males
have ranges that overlap several different female ranges.
The monogamous "family" consists
of one adult female, one male, and their offspring. Nonhuman primates that
are monogamous tend to mate for life and are usually highly territorial.
Gibbons and Indris are both typical of monogamous primates. In each case,
these species are highly vocal and use loud calls to warn others that they
"own" a territory.
The polyandrous groups consist of a single reproducing female and several
sexually active males. In these groups, several of the males usually participate
in the care of offspring.
Many primate species live in groups consisting of a single adult male along
with
several females and their
offspring. Adult males not living with females form separate bands (all-male)
or live alone as bachelors. The one-male groups are almost invariably characterized
by repeated efforts by outside males to takeover the position of the resident
male. In many instances, dependent infants are killed as a result of a change
in the status of a resident male. Competition is high in the one-male society.

Another type of social grouping among primates is the multimale group. Such groups are characterized by complex intratroop politics and competition. These groups tend to become relatively large in size with several males and numerous females and offspring.
Among the Gombe Stream chimpanzees that
Jane Goodall has studied is still another form of primate
society known as fission-fusion. The
social group tends to separate (fission) and then periodically join (fusion)
for feeding in rich areas for example. Individuals, females and their offspring,
or temporary groups (harems, all-male groups, for example) tend to form
associations on a temporary basis for various reasons. Yet, the group as
a whole tends to reunite in the ebb and flow of changing activities.
Primate social groupings are the result
of many selective factors that influence the size, composition, and dynamics
of the group. It is the dynamics between individuals that is of most importance
to primate behavioral studies. One other aspect of primate social behavior
is important. Many studies demonstrate that the social behavior for one
species frequently changes with differences in resource availability or
even demographic fluxuations. This only reinforces the idea that primate
social groups are the product of selection. Therefore, primate social groups
have tended to evolve as a means for survival around a variety of reproductive
strategies. Advantages and disadvantages are balanced through behavior responses
that one finds in different primate social groups.


Given that gorillas tend to maximize care
of infants and juveniles and estrus biologically shuts down for a prolonged
period in females, can you understand why gorillas live in harems (polygymous
socities)?
Keep in mind that primate social organization is varied. It is becoming
clear that there are differences between troops of chimpanzees or baboons.
There are differences, for example, that are striking between the chimpanzees
that Jane Goodall has studied in the Gombi area (as seen in the video People
of the Forest) and a group of chimpanzees known as Bonobo Chimpanzees (see
reading on Bonobo Society by Franz DeWaal.)
|
|