Mesa Community College Faculty Senate
Draft Minutes
Date: 2/19/2004
Time: 3:00 p.m.
|
Members: |
Representing/Office |
Present: |
Absent: |
|
Phillip Carrillo |
At-large |
X |
|
|
Harold Cranswick |
Zone 5 |
X |
|
|
Lyn Dutson |
Zone 1 |
|
X |
|
Charles Horn |
Active Retirees Rep. |
X |
|
|
Mehrzad Khorsandi |
At-large |
X |
|
|
Charles Lewis |
President |
X |
|
|
David Nachman |
Zone 8, Secretary |
X |
|
|
Gregg Pratt |
At-large |
X |
|
|
Erin Rawson |
At-large |
|
X |
|
Janice Reilly |
President-elect |
X |
|
|
Mona Scott |
At-large |
|
X |
|
John Seims |
Zone 4 |
X |
|
|
Ann Stine |
At-large, DCA liaison |
|
X |
|
Naomi Story |
Zone 7 |
X |
|
|
Barry Vaughan |
Zone 3 |
X |
|
|
Niccole Villa Cerveny |
At-large |
|
X |
|
Phillip Waclawski |
Zone 2, Treasurer |
X |
|
|
Maureen Zimmerman |
Zone 6 |
X |
|
I. Call to Order at 3:15 p.m.
II. Agenda Approval
The agenda was unanimously approved.
III. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the 2/5/2004 meeting were unanimously approved as amended.
IV. Treasurerıs Report
The Treasurer reported $50,334.38 in the Senateıs accounts.
V. Committee & Project Reports
No reports received.
VI. Old Business
VII. New Business
VIII. Information & Announcements
No report.
No report.
Charles Horn has sent invitations to active retired faculty inviting them to participate on a committee to establish the issues of importance to the community of 49%-ers.
Philip Carrillo made us aware of the collegeıs non-enforcement of the limit placed on the number of times a student may register for the same course. In one case, a disruptive student has registered for ENG101 12 times. The Senate leadership will ask Dean Johnson whether this is a problem in the advisement area or in the registration process. It may be that the new Student Information System will solve this problem.
Phillip Waclawski inquired as to the status of the 12-month pay option for faculty working on a 9-month academic calendar. The Senate has no information to suggest that the option will not be in place by summer 2004, as promised.
John Seims pointed out a faculty concern that the Department Chair Evaluation form might not uncover a department chairıs actual faults; that poor instructors and bad chairs could collude to cover up such faults.
Harold Cranswick reported that the concern for the mid-term and long-term future of Information Technology planning is widely shared. The Senate called for the initiation of a white-paper/visioning process, to involve technology-savvy faculty, especially young faculty whose future careers are most at stake.
Maureen Zimmerman reported that faculty are concerned about the confidentiality of the Department Chair evaluation process, and have suggested the need for revising Appendix D of the Residential Faculty Policies manual, which covers the selection, evaluation, and responsibilities of department chairs.
Naomi Story asked if the Senate would consider how faculty assigned in the Business & Industry Institute are represented among the Senate zones. She also distributed preliminary data on the disparate disbursement of funds from Proposition 301.