|
YYou are viewing
Volume 40, Issue 6
November 19, 2002
To return to the current issue please
click here.
|
 |
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
A taxing situation for smokers
Kurt R. Froehlich
Editor-in-Chief
Alas, piteous smokers!
Youve been kicked in the shins once again.
As if the incessant caveats, censures and cries of disapproval were not
enough, the voters of Arizona have nailed another fine tax into the ankles
and wrists of your profane addiction.
It really should not surprise anyone considering only 15 percent of Arizonas
population smoke.
The odds were against you from the start.
As you know well, all smokers reek of an unkempt chimney.
Secondly, you are the cause of countless medical woes, both for respectable
nonsmokers and your condemnable selves.
Indeed, Arizona recorded more than one billion dollars in medical costs
from smoking related diseases, according to the drafters of the righteous
tobacco proposition number 303.
Thirdly, adult smokers continue to corrupt Arizonas youths by smoking
in front of them.
The nerve!
Even though the incidence of teen smoking in the U.S. has dropped from
36.4 percent in 1997 to about 29 percent in 2001, the Center for Disease
Control and Prevention claims that one in four teens still smoke.
One in four!
Wait a minute.
Doesnt that mean that the numbers have been decreasing?
Have the anti-smoking ads effected this result, or is it the taxes that
deter teen smoking?
I guess well all find out soon.
And what about this billion dollar bill that smokers cut out of Arizonas
medical care?
Thats a very evil statistic.
Why, nonsmokers dont have the money to pay for your smoke related
illnesses.
Theyre not money trees.
But what about all the money Arizona receives from tobacco companies because
of the multi-state tobacco settlement in the nineties?
And wasnt there an economist out of Harvard by the name of Kip Viscusi
who pointed out that our state only pays approximately three cents per
pack for smoking related medical costs?
That 58 cent per pack tax increase should take care of that pesky three
cent per pack cost in medical bills.
While were at it, lets take five percent more of that and
throw it into tobacco use prevention and the other 90 percent or so and
throw it into new hospital gadgets and such.
Ignore that nagging thought about smokers and nonsmokers paying for such
things equally.
Thats not important.
Ooh! We could also let it just sit there in the bank for a while and see
what happens.
That could be fun.
Maybe, we could use it to mend our state deficit a little.
Actually, I think that was part of the plan in the first place.
Ive got another great idea.
Perhaps all of the voters, who rallied together to pass this proposition,
would like to make more money for the state in the future.
But who can they go after now?
How about the obese?
Yeah, Im sure they cost the state at least a couple of cents for
every five pounds or so.
Let us draft a bill taxing all fatty products.
Or go after the people who drink alcohol.
Drunk drivers kill many people, as well as costing the state money, every
year.
Tax them.
And then there are the creepy coffee drinkers who hang out in those freaky
coffee houses.
They probably dent the state budget in some way.
String them up, too.
Arizona could be the countrys biggest tycoon after we start taxing
all of these pitiful, lower class individuals and their base habits.
I could probably think of a few more abject minority groups to bludgeon
with a tax, but its time for my smoke break.
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
|
 |
|