|
You are viewing
Volume 40, Issue 9.
February 4, 2003
To return to the current issue please
click here.
|
 |
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
Increased contraceptive use, education means lowers
number of pregnant teens
By Joseph Luchenta
Mesa Legend
 |
 |
|
PHOTO BY CARLY SCHORMAN/MESA LEGEND
Shaeleen Johnston is glad she waited until
her 20s before deciding to have a child. She is expecting a son
in March.
|
Pregnancy among teenage girls in the United States has been on a downward
trend since the early nineties. Data released by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention showed that teen pregnancy rates fell to 48.5 births
per every 1,000 females aged 15 to 19 years old by 2000. This was down
almost 10 percent from the previous years which led to a record high of
62.1 births per 1,000 teenagers in 1991.
Teens of all ages have been included in this general decrease. Those in
the youngest demographic researched, 15 to 17 years, had a decrease of
29 percent, from 38.7 to 27.4 per 1,000. Older teens, those 18 to 19 years,
saw a decline from 94.4 to 79.2 per 1,000.
Arizonas teen pregnancy numbers have undergone similar changes despite
having the third highest rate in the United States. The Arizona Department
of Health Services, (ADHS), devoted serious research to the issue after
the implementation of a public awareness campaign referred to as Sex
Can Wait. The campaign focuses on the promotion of abstinence until
marriage and provides some ground level information accessible even for
pre-teens.
The ADHS research concluded that the state had a teen pregnancy rate slightly
higher than that of the nation in 2000 with 72 pregnancies per 1,000 females
aged 15 to 19 years. The report also stated that Arizona teens in all
racial and ethnic categories had higher rates of pregnancy than their
national respective peer groups.
The mystery behind the numbers, however, remains just that. Some have
speculated that there is a real increase in the practice of abstinence
but this is hard to prove from an empirical standpoint.
One major incentive is the cutback in welfare aid to teenage mothers.
The cutbacks began in 1996 after welfare reform was initiated. Ultimately,
states can act compassionately or not when dealing with teenage mothers
seeking welfare benefits.
Arizona has maintained relative moderation considering federal law allows
states to revoke welfare benefits from pregnant teens entirely. Starting
in 1995 with the enactment of EMPOWER, (Employing and Moving People Off
Welfare and Encouraging Responsibility), the ADHS has set family benefit
caps and invested over $2 million to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies
via education programs worked on in conjunction with the ADHS.
The reality of the situation, however, is that economic incentives and
education programs are not always going to prove effective. Arizona counties
with higher rates of poverty, and thus in theory more receptive to the
welfare reform incentives, have actually shown greater rates of teen pregnancy.
Both Santa Cruz and Yuma County have more pregnancies per 1,000 teens
than Maricopa. These counties also have mean hourly wages of $13.62 per
hour and $11.93 respectively, in comparison to Maricopas mean wage
of $16.12 per hour.
Very possibly, the epoch of contraceptive methods and their increased
availability are key factors in this declination phenomenon. That said,
there is the reoccurring stipulation that accompanies contraceptive use:
women do not have access for simple forms of on the spot contraceptive,
those that are applied and effective only during intercourse.
Certainly, females have innumerable methods by which to decrease their
fertility, most of which involve long term, regularly administered doses
of potent chemicals. But rarely will a female tell you this is a regimen
to which they are apathetic.
On the verge of revolutionizing contraceptives, a coalition known as Global
Campaign for Microbicides is attempting to put to market contraceptives
that can be applied topically prior to intercourse. Thus making it something
either party could initiate, even unbeknownst to their partner.
Many contraceptive/ STD preventatives are currently stalled at the research
stage. Of the 60 forms analyzed in research, 11 have proven safe for animals
and are now being used in human research.
A failure to attract government research funding and a pharmaceutical
industry unwilling to invest in microbicides is keeping the potential
society-altering product from coming to market. If microbicides prove
effective, the products could be available within 5 to 7 years, but only
with the proper funding.
Back to Top
| Previous Page | Home
|
 |
|