| by Naomi Story
Much has been said about the Center for Teaching and Learning’s
support to faculty in professional development. However,
a strong principle of the Center’s ethos is innovation. To
sustain new thinking, creativity, and scholarship in teaching
and learning, the Center is fostering learning spaces for faculty
to
- blur disciplinary boundaries and mindsets
- look at integrated and multiple approaches
- change metaphors from machines to organisms
- enrich communication and intelligence
How do we do and cultivate this new culture and thinking?
Let’s take a possible example. Faculties Jana, Davi,
and Sandy are from three different departments, a.k.a. academic
and workforce development areas. They have a common interest
in wanting to incorporate critical thinking into their lessons,
especially now that they have evidence from the latest Student
Outcomes Assessment results. They come to Cuppa at
the Center on Friday at the same time and start chatting over
donuts and tea about “what ifs.” A CTL person
(like Naomi) wanders by and starts to ask questions and “what
ifs.” They decide to continue the conversation next
Friday and use the wall talker to help them imagine and sketch
a new creative space for learning. They do some research
by asking other colleagues and students. They check websites
and outside vendors like Goodman’s about learning spaces
that enhance critical thinking. Naomi schedules one of
the CTL’s experimental classrooms so that the three can
test their ideas with students. They assess and evaluate
and revise and tweak and assess and so forth. And they share
at each stage of their findings with colleagues and their departments. Jana
and Davi write and publish an article about their journey and
discoveries.
The notion that innovation and the scholarship of teaching and
learning can exist at MCC is realistic. Faculty leaders,
who create, revive, regenerate, and communicate their calling
in teaching and learning have the space and the resources, and
need only imagine and commit to such an adventure and milieu
in innovation at the CTL. So why not? |