|
Organization/Design (30)
Organized correctly according to portfolio submission
table ( ___ components)
|
Overall appearance and format are of exceptional
quality. Well organized; unique/imaginative approach to design |
Overall appearance and format are of very good
quality; well organized |
Overall appearance and format meet basic guidelines. |
Overall appearance does not meet basic guidelines;
format poor; not organized |
|
|
Technical/Mechanics (30)
Table of Content as Index page with all links working correctly
|
Clear navigation; links work; content includes all
components; documents are error free (accurate, no spelling or grammatical
errors exist); portfolio has been converted to CD and posted to website |
Navigation is clear; all links work (if applicable);
content includes all components; documents are accurate; no serious
spelling or grammatical errors exist |
Navigation is clear; links work; content includes most
components; few spelling or grammar errors in documents; |
Difficult to navigate; links do not work; documents
missing; spelling and grammatical errors significantly detract from the
readability of the projects included in the portfolio;
|
|
|
Reflections ( 30 )
Provides adequate supporting reflections and details according to
information required. Depth/breadth: draws upon a wide array of varied
resources (journal entries, experience, labs, projects, other classes);
includes documented evidence |
Reflections are clearly related to objects/tasks
learned; reflections are well written and review depth and breadth of
experiences; connections are made with learning goals, current, course
work, practical experiences, and future application |
Reflections are related to objects/tasks learned;
reflections are well written; demonstrate learning and growth over time;
depth and breadth could be improved; connections are made with learning
goals, current course work, practical experiences, and future application |
Reflections are related to artifacts; reflections
missing and/or not complete and need revisions; connections are made with
learning goals, current course work, practical experiences, and future
application |
Reflections not related to artifacts; many reflections
missing and/or need to be more complete and require substantial improvement
and revisions; few/no connections are made with learning goals, current
course work, practical experiences, and/or future application |
|
|
Narrative Quality ( 30 )
|
All writing flows sensibly and logical, and all ideas
are presented in a clear and concise manner; provides a view of student’s
personality and uniqueness |
All writing flows sensibly and logical, and the
majority of the ideas are presented in a clear and concise manner; |
Most writing flows sensibly and logically, and ideas
are presented in a clear and concise manner. |
Writing does not flow sensibly and logically, and ideas
are not presented in a clear and concise manner |
|
|
Components ( 30 )
|
Component objects are related to reflections; no steps
missing; categories are complete; good variety of steps/objects included |
Component objects are related to reflections; no steps
missing; categories are complete; good variety of artifacts included |
Component objects are related to reflections; some
steps missing; a variety of steps/objects included |
Components are not related to reflections; many
steps/objects missing; little variety of steps/objects included |
|
